Hypermutation as a potential predictive biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy in high-grade gliomas: a broken dream?

A high tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency are observed in 'hypermutated' high-grade gliomas (HGGs); however, the molecular characterization of this distinct subtype and whether it predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are largely unknown. Pembrolizumab is a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of hypermutated cancers of diverse origin, but only a few clinical trials have explored the activity of ICIs in hypermutated HGGs. HGGs appear to differ from other cancers, likely due to the prevalence of subclonal versus clonal neoantigens, which are unable to elicit an immune response with ICIs. The main aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on hypermutation in HGGs, focusing on the broken promises of tumor mutational burden and mismatch repair deficiency as potential biomarkers of response to ICIs.

An interesting question arising in neuro-oncology is whether a high mutational load (a condition termed 'hypermutation') can be as immunogenic in high-grade gliomas as in other solid tumors. The most recent literature has raised the question of whether hypermutated high-grade gliomas may be 'insensitive' to immunotherapy, especially in patients pretreated with temozolomide, which is the standard of care for glioma therapy. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available evidence on hypermutated gliomas and their sensitivity to immunotherapy agents.

Activity of Systemic Treatments After Cabozantinib Failure in Advanced Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib, a potent multityrosine kinases inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated overall survival (OS) benefit over everolimus in patients previously treated with VEGFR TKI for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). The efficacy of systemic treatments after cabozantinib failure has not been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients receiving systemic treatment after cabozantinib failure in heavily pretreated patient with mRCC. We assessed Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), OS and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Among 150 patients treated with cabozantinib in our institution, 56 (37.3%) received subsequent systemic therapy and were eligible for the analysis. IMDC prognostic group was good, intermediate and poor in 11 (19.6%), 24 (42.9%) and 11 (19.6%) patients, respectively. Cabozantinib was administered mainly as a second (41.1%), or third (33.9%) line treatment. axitinib or immune-checkpoint inhibitors were the subsequent treatment in 18 (34.8%) patients for each everolimus (n:16, 28.6%), other angiogenesis inhibitors (n:4, 7.1%) TTF and OS from subsequent systemic therapy after cabozantinib failure were 2.8 months (95%CI 1.9-3.7) and 7.7 months (95%CI 4.4-10.8), respectively. ORR was 8.7% and 2 patients with axitinib and 2 patients treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors achieved a partial response. CONCLUSION: Overall, activity of systemic therapies after cabozantinib was limited.

Meningioma: not always a benign tumor. A review of advances in the treatment of meningiomas.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors. The majority of meningiomas are benign, but they can present different grades of dedifferentiation from grade I to grade III (anaplastic/malignant) that are associated with different outcomes. Radiological surveillance is a valid option for low-grade asymptomatic meningiomas. In other cases, the treatment is usually surgical, aimed at achieving a complete resection. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy is the gold standard for grade III, is debated for grade II and is not generally indicated for radically resected grade I meningiomas. The use of systemic treatments is not standardized. Here we report a review of the literature on the clinical, radiological and molecular characteristics of meningiomas, available treatment strategies and ongoing clinical trials.

Clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with brain metastases.

Brain metastases (BMs) represent a negative prognostic factor for patients with solid malignancies. BMs are generally approached with loco-regional treatments and the blood-brain barrier limits the efficacy of some systemic drugs. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the management of brain metastases in patients with solid malignancies. We performed a review of available literature. Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent the standard treatment for several advanced solid malignancies. However, with the exception of melanoma their clinical role in other solid malignancies is not completely clear due to the exclusion of patients with BM from approval clinical trials. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors may be an effective treatment of brain metastases of melanoma while their clinical role on brain metastases from other solid malignancies is uncertain.

Fighting cancer in coronavirus disease era: organization of work in medical oncology departments in Emilia Romagna region of Italy.

Aim: To assess the measures applied to reduce the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the timing of their application in medical oncology departments. Materials & methods: We surveyed all medical oncology departments from the Italian Emilia Romagna region via a multidomain questionnaire. The questions covered items on patients, healthcare workers, risk reduction measure and clinical trials. Results: A total of 12 centers involving 861 healthcare members joined the survey. The measures applied to patients and health workers partially converged in all the departments while major divergences were found in the clinical trials domain. High rate of COVID-19 infection occurred among medical doctors (21/208, 10.1%) and social care workers (13/110, 11.8%). Rate of infection among nurses was 5.7% (24/418). Conclusion: All measures able to reduce risk of COVID-19 infection must be applied in medical oncology departments. Early introduction of risk reduction measures may be a critical issue.

Immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma from poverty to the spoiled of choice.

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has been enriched by the advent of new therapeutic compounds. The approval of new combination strategies between targeted agents and immune-checkpoint inhibitors as well as the administration of combinations between immune-checkpoint inhibitors has clearly demonstrated significant improvement toward patients' prognosis and other clinical outcomes. Due to the availability of different treatments, the choice between them may be a difficult issue in our clinical practice. We have summarized current knowledge about available treatments focusing on criteria, which may help clinicians to make decisions.

Prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Estimate prognosis and clinical outcome of patients with localized or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an important issue which drive our medical decisions. METHODS: We carried out a meta-analysis of available clinical studies exploring neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in RCC in order to evaluate if this ratio could be correlated to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with localized/metastatic RCC. RESULTS: In overall population higher NLR resulted in worst OS and PFS (OS pooled hazard ratio of 1.80; 95% CI: 1.61-2.00; I2 45%; PFS pooled hazard ratio of 1.69; 95% CI: 1.42-2.01; I2 81%), this negative correlation was also confirmed in both metastatic and nonmetastatic patients. CONCLUSION: The NLR ratio is a variable correlated to prognosis in RCC patients.